Agreement Nothin' But Trouble

You know, I have been more than wiling
to sell my home to the Buyer right from
get go. I wasn't one of those homeowners
that refused to sell her home. I
think the Buyer was disappointed about
that because refusing to sell would have
played right into the Buyer's game plan.
Instead I was opposite. The Buyer
in response only purchased my former
neighbours' house (the house is a semi-
detached), half a house, when it could
have purchased both homes together. Why
would the Buyer prefer to purchase the
homes separately? Answer: Different
objectives based on where the homeowner
worked and their relationship with their
employer. There's an obvious oppportunitic
element to what has transpired thus far.

The Buyer and I do not have any prior
history and thus the Buyer really
doesn't have an issue with me or I with
the Buyer. However, my employer Ford Motor
Company is a partner in the cogeneration
project and that I believe is where the
problem is. Had it not been for my
employer's influence, both homes would
have been sold together. I would be outta
here just like my neighbours next door.

This Agreement is nothin' but trouble.
When you have to choose between the lesser
of two evils, if one of the evils is known
to you, you don't choose it. Though it may
choose you, don't choose it.

East Windsor Cogeneration LP - Half a House?
http://homesellersbeware.blogspot.com/2007/09/east-windsor-cogeneration-lp-half-house.html or find in September Archives